Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Baton Rouge

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 6, 1927No. 187PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMouton, J.

The Baton Rouge Water Works Company as assignee, is under contract to supply the City of Baton Rouge, the other defendant, with water; and, for that purpose, is authorized under the contract to take up mains and pipes in the streets of the city. A child of plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Smith, two years and six months old at the time, was drowned in a cut or excavation which had been made by the Baton Rouge Water Works Company in Julia Street of said city for the purpose of repairing a leaking valve in the main of the company’s • water pipe.

This excavation was approximately four feet, five inches…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Loftus v. . Union Ferry Company of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Westerfield v. Levis Bros.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
  3. Fox v. Oakland Consolidated Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Lopes v. SahuqueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  5. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. McEwen & Murray, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. WadeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Jeffreys v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Payne v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API