Hines v. New England Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendant from Connor, J., at February Term, 1916, of FRANKLIN.
1DissentBeowN, J.
I am of opinion that .the motion to nonsuit should have been sustained, because upon the plaintiff’s own testimony he is not entitled to recover. The admitted facts are that the plaintiff filed a written application with the defendant for a Plymouth Rock health policy, and in that application he represented that he had not been exposed to any contagious, or infectious disease, and that at the time of the application, nor for a year past, had he had any local or other disease, except as follows: “No .exceptions.”
It is admitted that at the time that the plaintiff filed this application and made…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gardner v. North State Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Bryant v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Fishblate v. Fidelity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Alexander v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Keerl v. . HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.