People v. Holland
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The suppression court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence seized from defendant at the time of his arrest. Defendant was observed by a police officer in an area of high drug activity, approaching several cars that had pulled over to the curb, talking with the occupants, reaching in with his hands, and then walking away. Those facts furnished the police with an objective, credible reason to approach defendant for the purpose of making inquiry (see, People v Sierra, 83 NY2d 928, 930; People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210, 223).…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. BoodleNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. SierraNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. CancerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- RAINEY, TERRANCE C., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- SIMMONS, TYRELL D., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015