Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Allerton

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1876Published

Appeal from an order made at Special Term, sustaining a demurrer to one defense set up by an answer.

1Opinion of the Court

Barnard, J.:

The complaint asks for the delivery to the plaintiff of “ one cow,” which the defendant has become possessed of and-wrongfully detains from the plaintiff.

*651The defendant William Watts makes three defenses:

1st. That he has no knowledge that plaintiff was the owner of one cow.

2d. A general denial.

3d. That defendant, under chapter 811 of the Laws of New York, passed May 9, 1867, took into his possession “a certain red cow,” which was ordered sold under that statute.

The plaintiff demurs to this last defense for the reason that it does not state facts sufficient to make a defense.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Belknap v. McIntyreNew York Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Sutherland v. TylerNew York Supreme Court · 1855

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API