Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Nomination Petition of Guzzardi

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 1, 2014Published

1DissentJustice Todd

I join Justice Baer’s Dissenting Opinion. I write separately to address two points raised by the majority.

First, the majority notes that “[s]ince the present situation is vastly different from the ‘natural disaster, fire, or bomb threat’ scenarios envisioned by the dissent, we do not address those here.” Majority Opinion at 386 n. 5 (citation omitted). Admittedly, an appeal for nunc pro tunc relief because “I was misinformed” (as herein) is “different” from an appeal for nunc pro tunc relief because, for example, a fire prevented access to the filing office, as the latter claim appears to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bricklayers of Western Pennsylvania Combined Funds, Inc. v. Scott's Development Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. COM., STATE ETHICS COM'N v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API