Legal Opinion · Dissent

Viele v. Division of Retirement

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 16, 1994No. 93-1649Published

1DissentErvin, Judge

Because appellant, Richard Viele, presented uncontradicted medical evidence which established that his psychological illness was related to his work, I dissent from the majority opinion affirming the State Retirement Commission’s denial of benefits, and would instead reverse and remand the case with directions that Viele be granted disability retirement benefits.

Viele was employed as a correctional officer by the Suwanee County Sheriffs Department for approximately ten years; thus, he was eligible for retirement benefits if his disability arose in the fine of duty. § 121.-091(4)(a), Fla.Stat.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Havener v. Division of RetirementDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Tingler v. City of TampaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Division of Retirement v. AllenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Dixon v. DEPT. OF ADMIN. DIV. OF RETIREMENTDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Andrews v. Division of RetirementDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API