Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Baddeley

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1894PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Third District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of McLean county; the Hon. Thojias F. Tipton, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

This was an action on the ease, brought by Charles H. Baddeley, administrator of the estate of Emily Humphrey, deceased, against the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Eailway Company to recover damages for the death of the plaintiff’s intestate, caused, as alleged, by the negligence of the defendant. The deceased was struck and killed by one of-the defendant’s locomotive engines, August 27, 1892, at a crossing of the defendant’s railway over a public street of the city of Leroy, McLean county. The negligence charged in the declaration consists of recklessly, wantonly, carelessly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Chicago v. MajorIllinois Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. KuhIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Lincoln v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Collison v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Chicago City Ry. Co. v. WallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  5. Calvert v. DillmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API