Legal Opinion
FULLMAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 27, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00969Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANDREW FULLMAN, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al., NO. 24-969 Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, Andrew Fullman, brings this action under
42 U.S.C. § 1983
and Pennsylvania state law. His claims under Section 1983 are for denial of due process, malicious prosecution, violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, supervisory liability, failure to intervene, and conspiracy to deprive him of constitutional rights (including claims against the City of Philadelphia pursuant to Monell v.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Paul Lamont Parham v. Marshall Johnson, Jr., Medical Doctor Charles J. Kozakieqicz Tom Forester, Commissioner Joseph Mazurkiewicz, ph.dCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Mary Ann Pensiero, Inc. v. LingleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Tera Knoll v. City of AllentownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.