In re the Estate of Ryan
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
The sole question of importance in the case at bar is as to the propriety of a distribution of New York assets by an ancillary executor appointed in this State. The facts involved are somewhat unusual, but by no means unique. Testator was a resident of California and left a will and codicil which are in all respects valid under the laws of both States. They were originally admitted to probate in California. Decedent had property located both here and there. All creditors in both localities are paid. By item “ Second ” of his will he devised the entire residue of his estate located…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Caulfield v. . SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- In re Probate of the Last Will & Testament of AndrewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- United States Trust Co. v. WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Kellogg v. WhiteNew York Supreme Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Estate of HorwichNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
- In re the Estate of MarinanoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936