Legal Opinion

Velocity Express v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 2004PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Velocity Express (Velocity) and David Kardos (Kardos) (together, Appellants) petition for review of the December 9, 2003, order of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission (PHRC) denying Appellants’ motions to dismiss discrimination charges filed against Appellants. We reverse.

Velocity is in the business of providing local delivery service, and, at all relevant times, Velocity employed Kardos as an operations manager. (Appellants’ Brief at Exh. B.) Sometime in 2002, Velocity entered into a written contract with Julie Eileen Sheriff (Sheriff), whereby Sheriff would…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McClellan v. Health Maintenace OrganizationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Bethenergy Mines Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Rosen v. Bureau of Professional and Occupational AffairsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Borough of Economy v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Brown v. J. Kaz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. Tri-County Landfill, Inc. v. Pine Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Malt Beverages Distributors Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Hewitt v. BS Transp. of Ill., LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Dixon v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API