Legal Opinion

State v. Peeples

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1995No. 1995-0357PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 73 Ohio St.3d 149.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. PEEPLES, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Peeples,

1995-Ohio-36.] Appellate procedure—Successive applications for reopening appeal from judgment and conviction based on claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel—Application denied—App.R. 26(B) makes no provision for filing successive applications to reopen. (No. 95-357—Submitted April 24, 1995—Decided August 16, 1995.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 54708. __________________ {¶ 1} Appellant, Kavin L.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ReddickOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. PeeplesOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. PeeplesOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Huber, Unpublished Decision (6-28-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Miller v. MellotOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. State v. TownsendOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State v. MaysOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. U.S. Bank v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API