Legal Opinion
Rucker v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided January 25, 1961No. 32719PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWoodley, Judge
The appeal is from a conviction for violation of an ordinance of the city of Marshall. The prosecution arose in the corporation court where appellant was found guilty and assessed a $200 fine. He appealed to the county court and the trial resulted in a like fine being assessed by the jury.
The ordinance provides: “It shall be unlawful for any peddler, salesman, solicitor, or any other person who goes on the premises of another person, to remain on such premises after he has been ordered by any lawful occupant to leave such premises.”
The punishment for violation of said ordinance is found in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Breard v. AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Tigner v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- State v. Standard Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Lawton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Sonnier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Matchett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Richard Lucas v. United States of America, Richard Lucas, Cross-Appellees v. United States of America, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Milligan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.