Legal Opinion

Nardozzi v. Bank of Boston Connecticut, No. 090799 (Apr. 23, 1992)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided April 23, 1992No. 090799Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION re MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#113) The defendants in an action charging malicious prosecution CT Page 3760 have moved for summary judgment on the plaintiff's complaint.

Before summary relief is appropriate it must be demonstrated that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact. Wilson v. New Haven, 213 Conn. 277, 279 (1989). In making such finding the court is required to examine the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmovant. United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Wilson v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. McHale v. W.B.S. Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Fatone v. DeDomenicoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  5. Smith v. Globe Ford, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API