Legal Opinion

Longmont National Bank v. Loukonen

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1912No. 7108PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Boulder District Court. — Hon. Harry P. Gamble, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

Claiming to have purchased it for value before maturity, in due course of business, The Longmont National Bank bought this action against William Loukonen, the ffiaker, to recover the amount due on the following promissory note:

“$700.00. Longmont, Colo., O’ct. 28, 1908.

One year after date, for value received, we or either of us, jointly and severally, promise to pay to B. F. Bonneivell, or' order, the sum of seven hundred and no-100 dollars, at the Central National Bank, Denver, Colo., with interest at the rate of six per centum per annum until paid. Interest payable annually,

■ And a failure…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Bank of Commerce v. KenneyTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  2. City National Bank v. Goodloe-McClelland Commission Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Farmer v. Bank of GraettingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Jacobs v. GibsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. BaldwinNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  2. First National Bank v. StoverNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Iowa State Savings Bank v. WignallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Townsend v. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  5. United States v. General Resources, Ltd.District Court, D. Colorado · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API