Legal Opinion

Wultz v. Islamic Republic of Iran

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 20, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2008-1460Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) SHERYL WULTZ, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) 08-cv-1460 (RCL) ) ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM Plaintiffs have moved for leave to depose the Bank of China’s (BOC) Israeli-law experts prior to the Court’s adjudication of BOC’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims based on Israeli law. Pls.’ Mot. to Permit the Parties to Depose the Opposing Parties’ Israeli Law Declarants & for Related Relief, Aug. 18, 2009, ECF No. 43 [hereinafter Pls.’ Mot]. Because plaintiffs wish to conduct depositions before…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bodum USA, Inc. v. La Cafetiere, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. In Re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. ATX, ATX II and Wilderness Tires Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API