Legal Opinion
United States v. 63.04 Acres of Land
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 24, 1958No. 251, Docket 24886PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
Shortly after the remand of this condemnation case as ordered in our earlier opinion, 245 F.2d 140, Chief Judge Inch, who had served as trier at the first trial, assigned the case for prompt hearing and announced that he construed the appellate order to require only a reopening of the judgment and of the record already made to permit of the introduction of evidence of the September 1954 sale, the exclusion of which had been the only ground of reversal. We think this interpretation not unreasonable: it is consistent with procedure sanctioned when a trial judge grants a “motion for a new trial”…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gulbenkian v. GulbenkianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- United States v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- United States v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Riordan v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- National Comics Publications, Inc. v. Fawcett Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Braniff Airways, Inc., Phillip Addabbo, and Morton D. Stein, as of the Estate of Maurice Berg, Deceased v. Curtiss-Wright CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- In Re PaolinoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Factors Etc., Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Potlatch Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1982
- Braniff Airways, Inc., Phillip Addabbo, and Morton D. Stein, as of the Estate of Maurice Berg, Deceased v. Curtiss-Wright CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.