Legal Opinion · Dissent

Burgin v. Owen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 6, 2007No. COA06-450Published

1DissentTyson, Judge

The majority’s opinion holds “plaintiff’s complaint failed to state a legally sufficient claim and .'. . affirm[s] the trial court’s order granting defendants’ [Rule 12(b)(6)] motion to dismiss and canceling the lis pendens attached to the subject property.” Taking the allegations in plaintiff’s complaint as true, his allegations state a claim for which relief can be granted to survive defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. I vote to reverse the trial court’s order and respectfully dissent.

I. Standard of Review

Our Supreme Court has stated:

The test on a motion to dismiss for failure to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Oberlin Capital, L.P. v. SlavinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Dixon v. StuartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Country Club of Johnston County, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Forbis v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Lewis v. . MurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API