Legal Opinion

Matter of Davis v. Board of Education

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 18, 1942PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree that under the provisions of the Education Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 16) then in force, the petitioner was entitled to the relief accorded to him by the order of the Appellate Division. After that order was made the Legislature, however, declared that these provisions “ shall be suspended and unenforceable * * * until July first, nineteen hundred forty-three,” and it gave temporary sanction to administrative action which until then was unlawful. (L. 1942, chs. 728, 729, 760.) So long as that sanction exists, the courts can give no directions for the enforcement of provisions of the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re SkipwithNew York Family Court · 1958
  2. Jacobson v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  3. O'Reilly v. GrumetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  4. Wallace v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API