Legal Opinion

Wolfe v. Barnett

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 15, 1872No. 2182PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Fourth District Court, parish of Orleans. Théard, J.

1Opinion of the Court

This case was tried by a jury in the court below.

Howe, J.

Tlie principal point involved in this case is one relating to the law of trade marks.

The plaintiff enjoined the defendants from preparing and selling or offering to sell any imitation of plaintiff’s gin, or any article with or under the name or title of “ Wolfe’s Aromatic Schiedam Schnapps,” or “ Aromatic Schiedam Schnapps,” or “ Schiedam Schnapps,” or from using any imitation of said name; and claimed damages for an alléged infringement by defendants of his rights as the manufacturer of this kind of gin and as the originator of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clark v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. S. R. Feil Co. v. John E. Robbins Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
  2. W. A. Gaines & Co. v. E. Whyte Grocery, Fruit & Wine Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Burrell v. MichauxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. New Orleans Coffee Co. v. American Coffee Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  5. A. Cusimano & Co. v. Olive Oil Importing Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API