Legal Opinion
Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Ward
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided April 23, 1979No. 78-309PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Darrell Hickman, Justice.
The Arkansas State Highway Commission appeals this condemnation case alleging only one error: The court erred in not striking the testimony of the appellees’ expert witness. We find no error and affirm the judgment.
The appellant sought condemnation in 1975 of .97 acres owned by the appellees to be used in construction of a bypass of the city of Clinton.
The case was tried to the jury on the issue of damages and the appellees called only one expert witness on this issue. He gave an opinion that the damages to the appellees were some $14,744.00. The expert witness for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ark. State Highway Comm. v. RussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Lazenby v. Ark. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. First Pyramid Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. N.W.A. Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. BarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. RoetzelCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
- Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corp. v. BoggsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004