Legal Opinion
People v. David H.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 6, 2003No. B156841PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOLAND, J.
Summary
Appellant David H. appeals from the juvenile court’s order sustaining a petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602. He contends the court erred in calculating the maximum confinement time by including time for stayed counts of two previously sustained petitions. We agree.
Factual and Procedural Background
On October 15, 2001, the People filed a Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 petition (current petition) alleging appellant escaped from a juvenile facility in July 2001. The petition notified appellant that the People sought to have him confined on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. LatimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Shawn Garfield Price v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. CoddingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. WileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. Joseph M.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. Geneva C.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- In re A.M. CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
- In re Cristian B. CA5California Court of Appeal · 2013
- In re Derrick B. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.