Legal Opinion

Widow v. Morrill

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1879PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Van Burén. Appeal from so much of an order of the probate court as disallowed certain items in the account of appellant acting as administrator. The widow and heirs of the intestate brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Mabston J.

A hearing and determination was had in the probate court upon the final account of Morrill as administrator of the estate of the deceased.

Morrill feeling aggrieved took an appeal to the circuit court, in which he set forth that the probate court did adjudge and decree that certain items in his report contained be disallowed, setting forth the items, and added: “Now therefore the undersigned Charles M. Morrill, administrator aforesaid, feeling himself aggrieved by the decision and determination of the said judge of probate, as to so much and such part of his finding as appears above,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wisner v. Estate of MabLeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Hibner v. WilsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Reed v. WhippleMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  4. In Re Gray EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Cummin v. BaldwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API