Legal Opinion

People v. Bagby

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 2006PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Rory J. Bellantoni, J.

*883This proceeding concerns whether defendant, who presently is incarcerated for 90 days following a conviction for a parole violation, may be resentenced under the recently enacted Rockefeller Drug Law Reform Act pertaining to those individuals previously convicted of an A-I or A-II felony drug offense.

Defendant filed a motion pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 440.20, and a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, in which he asserted that he should be resentenced based upon the Rockefeller Drug Law Reform Act (Penal Law §§ 60.04, 70.70, 70.71; L 2004,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Menechino v. WardenNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. People v. LaFontaineNew York Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Paliotto v. Town of IslipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  4. People v. StephenNew York Supreme Court · 2005
  5. People v. Weaver, New York County Courts2005

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. OvertonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. PrattsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. People v. McCloudAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. People v. CuebasNew York Supreme Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API