Legal Opinion

Boardman v. Howard

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 17, 1903No. Nos. 13,507—(160)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Ramsey, county, O. B. Lewis, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

LOVELY, J. 1

This is an action to recover unpaid rent;' also, for expenses of the landlord incurred in removing property damaged by fire and left on the premises by the tenant after surrendering the same. The cause was tried to the court, who made findings of fact, and held as a conclusion of- law that plaintiffs were entitled to recover a portion of one month’s rent; also, a specific sum for expenses incurred by the landlord in taking away injured goods of defendants after they had quit. This appeal is from an order denying a new trial.

The following facts are embraced in the findings of the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lincoln Square Corp. v. Motor City Paper Tube Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
  2. GENERAL MILLS, Inc. v. GOLDMAN (INDIANA LUMBERMENS MUT. INS. CO. OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA, Intervener)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  3. GENERAL MILLS, Inc. v. GOLDMAN (INDIANA LUMBERMENS MUT. INS. CO. OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA, Intervener)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  4. General Mills, Inc. v. Goldman (Indiana Lumbermens Mut. Ins. Co. Of Indianapolis, Indiana, Intervener)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API