Legal Opinion

Security Federal Savings v. Devlin

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 30, 1992No. 1905Published

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

This appeal arises out of a foreclosure action. Security Federal Savings, FSB, Successor in Interest to Security Federal Savings & Loan Association of South Carolina, filed a post-trial motion to amend the master’s report and order of foreclosure and judgment “so as to demand a deficiency judgment.” Security Federal claimed it inadvertently failed to include in its complaint a demand for a deficiency judgment and, as a consequence, the master’s order failed to grant it a deficiency judgment. The master vacated the judgment and allowed Se*548curity Federal to amend its complaint.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. H & H Glass Co., Inc. v. WynneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API