Legal Opinion

Valkenberg v. Treasurer of Territory

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Assessment of Stamp Duty made by the Treasurer.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

GALBRAITH, J.

The appellant, a shareholder in a Hawaiian corporation, appointed a third party his agent, or proxy, to act and vote1 for him at a designated meeting of the stockholders of the corporation. The appointment was in writing and in form bore some resemblance to a power of attorney but was not under seal or acknowledged. It was headed “Stockholder’s proxy.” The Treasurer of the Territory, ruled, that this writing was a power of attorney and subject to a stamp- duty of $1.00 under Section 941, O. L. The appellant being dissatisfied with this ruling paid the duty…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kapena v. Bishop & Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Re Taxes, Haw'n Pineapple Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  2. In re Assessment of Taxes, C. Brewer & Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Hawaiian Trust Co. v. BorthwickHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
  4. In re the Assessment of Stamp Duty on Deeds to Robert Love Estate, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Re Taxes, Haw'n Pineapple Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API