In re Cullinan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by Patrick W. Cullinan, as State Commissioner of Excise of the State of Hew York, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Queens on the 29th day of January, 1902, denying- the petitioner’s application for an order revoking and canceling a liquor tax certificate issued to Adell Hartman, and from the judgment entered in said clerk’s office upon such order on the 29th day of…
Read the full summary
Appeal by Patrick W. Cullinan, as State Commissioner of Excise of the State of Hew York, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Queens on the 29th day of January, 1902, denying- the petitioner’s application for an order revoking and canceling a liquor tax certificate issued to Adell Hartman, and from the judgment entered in said clerk’s office upon such order on the 29th day of January, 1902.
1Opinion of the Court
Woodward, J.:
This is a proceeding under the provisions of subdivision 2 of section 28 of the Liquor Tax Law (Laws of 1896, chap. .112, as amd. by Laws of 1901, chap. 640) for an order-revoking liquor tax certificate Ho. 21,305 issued to Adell Hartman, under subdivision 1 of section 11 of the Liquor Tax Law (as amended by Laws of 1897, chap. 312). It is alleged in the petition *47that five special agents of the Excise Department were admitted to the barroom of the premises for which the said liquor tax •certificate was issued, and that the said special agents bought and consumed upon the premises…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Constant v. University of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- In re SchuylerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- In re HenryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900