Legal Opinion
Ulster Savings Bank v. Total Communities, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 1975PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge L. Cobb, J.
In a mortgage foreclosure action, defendants J & G Drywall, Inc., Cody Lumber Company, Inc., Whitman Electric, Inc., Rosakranse Masonry, Inc., Bank Bros. Plumbing & Heating, Inc., each move pursuant to CPLR 5015 for an order vacating, setting aside and relieving each such defendant from the judgment of foreclosure and sale heretofore entered herein.
Plaintiff opposes the motion, in part, upon claims that the movants’ present counsel has not been properly substituted as such pursuant to CPLR 321 (subd [b]), that the motion papers were not properly served because only one copy of the summons and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- HNC Realty Co. v. Golan Heights Developers, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1974
- Palmer v. PalmerNew York City Family Court · 1969
- Hurley v. ReouxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Caro v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Gallo v. BoscoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
3Cited by2 opinions
- Security National Bank v. Village Mall at Hillcrest, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1976
- Roslyn Savings Bank v. Lynch III Properties Corp. (In Re Lynch III Properties Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1991