Buel v. . Southwick
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal fr-om order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, affirming an order of Special Term requiring Jacob Leonard, purchaser at a judicial sale herein, to take a deed ' and complete his purchase. This was an action of partition.
Read the full summary
Appeal fr-om order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, affirming an order of Special Term requiring Jacob Leonard, purchaser at a judicial sale herein, to take a deed ' and complete his purchase. This was an action of partition. The premises hi question are situate in the city of Albany, and were formerly the property of Jesse Buel, who died seized thereof in October, 1839, leaving a last will and testament, in and by which he devised, said premises to his. son, Charles Buel, “ subject to the conditions and contingencies hereinafter mentioned.”…
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
The testator by his will gave, devised, and bequeathed to his son, Charles, the premises described in the complaint in this action, “ subject to the conditions and contingencies hereinafter mentioned.”.After making various other devises, he provided that all the said several gifts and devises before mentioned to his children,, who were named, “ are made, upon the express condition and subject to the conditions * * * that the gift and devise to each is made and given to each, and his, her, or their direct lineal descendants, should he, she, or they have any, in fee simple absolutely; but in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Livingston v. . GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
3Cited by16 opinions
- Vanderzee v. SlingerlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Fowler v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- March v. . MarchNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Nellis v. . NellisNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- In Re the Accounting of CramerNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.