Legal Opinion

KANEFSKY v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 20, 2020No. 2:18-cv-15536Unknown

1Opinion

FUONRI TTEHDE SDTISATTREISC DTI OSTFR NIECWT C JOERUSRETY DAVID KANEFSKY, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, 18-cv-15536 Plaintiff, v. OPINION HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., DARIUS ADAMCZYK, and THOMAS A. SZLOSEK., Defendants. WILLIAM J. MARTINI, U.S.D.J.: This putative securities class action arises out of Defendant Honeywell International Inc.’s purportedly false and misleading statements regarding asbestos-related liabilities. The matter comes before the Court on Wayne County Employees’ Retirement System’s (“WCRS”) motion for reconsideration, ECF No. 81, of the Court’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  2. George v. Siemens Industrial Automation, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API