KANEFSKY v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion
FUONRI TTEHDE SDTISATTREISC DTI OSTFR NIECWT C JOERUSRETY DAVID KANEFSKY, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, 18-cv-15536 Plaintiff, v. OPINION HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., DARIUS ADAMCZYK, and THOMAS A. SZLOSEK., Defendants. WILLIAM J. MARTINI, U.S.D.J.: This putative securities class action arises out of Defendant Honeywell International Inc.’s purportedly false and misleading statements regarding asbestos-related liabilities. The matter comes before the Court on Wayne County Employees’ Retirement System’s (“WCRS”) motion for reconsideration, ECF No. 81, of the Court’s…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- George v. Siemens Industrial Automation, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998