Legal Opinion

Ballantine v. Ballantine

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 18, 1908No. 52PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey.

1Per curiam

This case has been thoroughly presented by counsel and has received our careful consideration. But nothing could profitably he added to the opinion of the learned judge below. We concur in his conclusion, and think he adequately sustained it. Ballantine v. Ballantine (C. C.) 152 Fed. 775. The contention that a bequest to executors, in trust to pay the income to a son until such time as *928they think proper to pay him the principal, entitles the son to demand the principal immediately, or on reaching his majority, has been strongly urged, and is not wholly unsupported by judicial decision; but…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ballantine v. BallantineU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blossom v. AnketellDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1921
  2. Chase v. WorthCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
  3. In re BallantineDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API