Legal Opinion

Taylor v. City of Springfield

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Cou/rt.—Hon. James T. Neville, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

—The plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment for $1,000 on account of injuries, *264received by a fall in consequence of a defective sidewalk in the city of Springfield. The petition contains two counts. , The one charges that the defective construction of the sidewalk was the cause of the mis bap: the other charges that the accident was due to the sidewalk being out of repair. The answer is a' general denial, and a plea of contributory negligence. The jury made a general finding. The defendant moved in arrest of judgment, claiming that the failure of the jury to find on each count separately…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brownell v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  2. Lancaster v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  3. Flynn v. City of NeoshoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. Henry v. Wabash Western RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Burnison v. SoundersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Waltemeyer v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Stevens v. WalpoleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Culverson v. City of MaryvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API