Jenks v. Wells
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair. (Canfield, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
On the 31st day of March, 1886, the defendant, having commenced to sink a salt well, and having reached a depth of 650 feet, entered into a contract with Mason & Bro. by which Mason & Bro. agreed to sink the well an additional 1,200 feet at the agreed price of $1.75 per foot. Advances were made to the amount of about $263.30 prior to August 9, and on August 9 Mason & Bro. gave plaintiffs an order as follows:
“Port Huron, August 9, 1886.
“Fred. L. Wells, Esq.,
“Port Huron, Mich..
“Sir: Please pay to William S. Jenks and Orrin L. Jenks, doing business under the style and firm name of the Phoenix…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Ahrens & Ott Mfg. Co. v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1914