Legal Opinion

Dunning v. Lake Erie & Western Railroad

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1906No. 5,619PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Erom Howard Superior Court; B. F. Harness, Judge. Action by Rosa C. Dunning against the Lake Erie & Western Railroad Company. Erom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

Action by appellant to recover damages for personal injury sustained in alighting from a train. *92Answer, general denial. Trial, verdict for appellant for $500, and also answers to interrogatories. Appellee’s motion for judgment on the answers to interrogatories sustained.

Appellant’s'assignment of errors presents the question of the correctness of the court’s ruling in sustaining appellee’s motion for judgment on the answers to interrogatories. Appellee assigns cross-error that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The complaint avers facts showing that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas City Railroad v. WingateIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. HixonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chicago, Terre Haute & Southeastern Railway Co. v. CollinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Croty v. Pullman Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API