Smoak v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDonald L. Corbin, Justice
While I agree with the majority’s conclusion that there was sufficient evidence supporting Appellant’s conviction, I disagree with the majority’s decision to reverse and remand this case because Appellant failed to properly preserve the entrapment issue for our review.
It is a well-settled principle of appellate jurisprudence that this court will not review an allegation that a circuit court erred in failing to give an instruction where the appellant failed to proffer such instruction. E.g., Davis v. State, 2009 Ark. 478, 348 S.W.3d 553; Robertson v. State, 2009 Ark. 430, 347 S.W.3d 460;…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Hart v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Young v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.