Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Windham

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1992No. D-0619Published

1DissentMauzy, Justice

The court today legitimizes a mechanism that dramatically enhances the State’s power to deprive Texas landowners of their property without full compensation. At issue is whether a landowner has the right to designate an economic unit reflecting the highest and best use of property condemned by the State. Because today’s opinion compromises that right, I dissent.

The Texas Constitution prohibits the State from taking property for public use without “adequate compensation.” Tex. Const, art. I, § 17. This provision, we have held, entitles a landowner to be compensated for the full value of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State v. MeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. City of Richardson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. State v. Enterprise Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API