State v. Windham
Texas Supreme Court
1DissentMauzy, Justice
The court today legitimizes a mechanism that dramatically enhances the State’s power to deprive Texas landowners of their property without full compensation. At issue is whether a landowner has the right to designate an economic unit reflecting the highest and best use of property condemned by the State. Because today’s opinion compromises that right, I dissent.
The Texas Constitution prohibits the State from taking property for public use without “adequate compensation.” Tex. Const, art. I, § 17. This provision, we have held, entitles a landowner to be compensated for the full value of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. MeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- City of Richardson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- State v. Enterprise Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.