Legal Opinion

Furnival MacHinery Co. v. King

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 9, 1976PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

142 N.J. Super. 251 (1976)

361 A.2d 91

FURNIVAL MACHINERY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

WILLIAM H. KING AND STANLEY LAPINSKI, INDIVIDUALLY, T/A LAKING CONSTRUCTION CO., AND LAKING CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 2, 1976.

Decided June 9, 1976.

Before Judges KOLOVSKY, BISCHOFF and BOTTER.

Mr. Sherwin Drobner argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Bloom, Drobner and Javerbaum, attorneys).

Mr. Jeffrey M. Martin argued the cause for defendant-respondent Lapinski.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KOLOVSKY, P.J.A.D.

On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Newman v. ChaseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  2. King v. GreeneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  3. Kobrin v. DrazinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  4. Fredd v. DarnellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  5. Bassett v. ThackaraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Associates Commercial v. LangstonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  2. In Re VitulloDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
  3. Party Parrot v. BIRTHDAYS & HOL.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  4. Clifton v. Tavares (In Re Clifton)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1983
  5. Chemical Bank v. JamesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API