Legal Opinion

Kaufman v. Limobusters, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 2, 1992No. 63041PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiff-appellant, Stu Kaufman, appeals from the judgment of the Cuyaho-ga County Court of Common Pleas granting defendant-appellee Limobusters, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Appellant Stu Kaufman operated a limousine service in the greater Cleveland area. In 1986, appellant Kaufman registered his trade name “Limobus-ters” with the Secretary of State and continued operating his limousine service under that trade name, which consisted primarily of renting out a chauffeured motor home.

In 1987, appellant Kaufman became aware of “Limobusters,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ameritech, Inc., an Ohio Corporation v. American Information Technologies Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, D/B/A AmeritechCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  2. Tandy Corporation v. Malone & Hyde, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  3. Wsm, Incorporated v. Tennessee Sales Company, a General Partnership Comprising Bob Beasley and Nathan DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  4. Southern Ohio Bank v. Southern Ohio Savings Ass'nOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. SCI Systems, Inc. v. Solidstate Controls, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States Playing Card Co. v. Bicycle ClubOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API