Kaufman v. Limobusters, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff-appellant, Stu Kaufman, appeals from the judgment of the Cuyaho-ga County Court of Common Pleas granting defendant-appellee Limobusters, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
Appellant Stu Kaufman operated a limousine service in the greater Cleveland area. In 1986, appellant Kaufman registered his trade name “Limobus-ters” with the Secretary of State and continued operating his limousine service under that trade name, which consisted primarily of renting out a chauffeured motor home.
In 1987, appellant Kaufman became aware of “Limobusters,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ameritech, Inc., an Ohio Corporation v. American Information Technologies Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, D/B/A AmeritechCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Tandy Corporation v. Malone & Hyde, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Wsm, Incorporated v. Tennessee Sales Company, a General Partnership Comprising Bob Beasley and Nathan DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Southern Ohio Bank v. Southern Ohio Savings Ass'nOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
- SCI Systems, Inc. v. Solidstate Controls, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States Playing Card Co. v. Bicycle ClubOhio Court of Appeals · 1997