Legal Opinion

James A. Picard v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 26, 1999No. 97-70954PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:

The appellant James A. Picard (“Picard”) challenges the Tax Court’s ruling that his disability retirement benefits are taxable under Internal Revenue Code (“I.R.C.”) § 61(a). The Tax Court held that the induction of Picard’s disability-retirement benefits on the twenty-fifth anniversary of his date of hire constituted a determination of benefits by reference to length of service, thereby •removing the benefits from tax exclusion under I.R.C. § 104(a)(1)’s exemption for disability compensation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1) and 28…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dyer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  2. Givens v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  3. Robert C. Wiedmaier Irene O. Wiedmaier v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sewards v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Sewards v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  3. Jay Sewards and Frances Sewards v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  4. Sewards v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  5. Tateosian v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API