James A. Picard v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
The appellant James A. Picard (“Picard”) challenges the Tax Court’s ruling that his disability retirement benefits are taxable under Internal Revenue Code (“I.R.C.”) § 61(a). The Tax Court held that the induction of Picard’s disability-retirement benefits on the twenty-fifth anniversary of his date of hire constituted a determination of benefits by reference to length of service, thereby •removing the benefits from tax exclusion under I.R.C. § 104(a)(1)’s exemption for disability compensation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1) and 28…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dyer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
- Givens v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
- Robert C. Wiedmaier Irene O. Wiedmaier v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sewards v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Sewards v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
- Jay Sewards and Frances Sewards v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2012
- Sewards v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
- Tateosian v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.