Legal Opinion

Law Offices of Frank N. Peluso, P.C. v. Rendahl

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 24, 2017No. AC38036PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs, Law Offices of Frank N. Peluso, P.C., and Frank Peluso, appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their complaint against the defendant, Joy M. Rendahl, on the basis of absolute litigation immunity. We agree with the defendant that the plaintiffs' brief on appeal is inscrutable. Nonetheless, even if we were to read the plaintiffs' primary claim broadly, in the manner advanced at oral argument, i.e., as claiming that the defendant does not have absolute immunity or, alternatively, that we should abrogate any legal precedent affording the defendant absolute…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rioux v. BarrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. DePietro v. Department of Public SafetyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. Stone v. PattisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Deutsche Bank AG v. VikConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API