State v. Fewell
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLuckert, J.
I dissent from the majority’s determination that there was probable cause to search the person of Ramon I. Fewell. I concur in the other holdings of the majority.
Regarding the majority’s analysis of the probable cause issue, I do not quarrel with the statements regarding the applicable law. Rather, I disagree with the application of those principles to the facts of this case. Specifically, I reject the majority’s conclusion that the officer’s investigation did not lessen the reasonable suspicion that arose from Fewell’s presence in a vehicle that smelled of burnt marijuana.
As the majority…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.