Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Fewell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 30, 2008No. 95,041Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLuckert, J.

I dissent from the majority’s determination that there was probable cause to search the person of Ramon I. Fewell. I concur in the other holdings of the majority.

Regarding the majority’s analysis of the probable cause issue, I do not quarrel with the statements regarding the applicable law. Rather, I disagree with the application of those principles to the facts of this case. Specifically, I reject the majority’s conclusion that the officer’s investigation did not lessen the reasonable suspicion that arose from Fewell’s presence in a vehicle that smelled of burnt marijuana.

As the majority…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API