Legal Opinion

Wigfall v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 21, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with using a controlled substance after a sample of his urine twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. He was found guilty of this charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the *800determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Odome v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Prentiss v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. El v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Young v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Costner v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API