Legal Opinion

Cariello v. Northern Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1963PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNicholas M. Pette, J.

Defendant Northern Insurance Company of New York (hereinafter referred to as “Northern”) moves to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that plaintiff, has no legal capacity to sue; that the court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action; that the complaint fails to state a cause of action, and that documentary evidence exists providing a defense thereto. Defendant moves pursuant to rule 3211 of the Civil Practice Law and Buies.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment on a policy of fire insurance covering a house, its contents, a garage, and loss of use and rental value.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clinton v. . the Hope Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Weed v. Hamburg—Bremen Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Spaulding v. First National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  4. Wolff v. Brontown Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  5. Marrero v. LevittCity of New York Municipal Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brenon v. County of OneidaNew York Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API