Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Conn

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 21, 1915PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Garrard Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*328Opinion op the Court by

William; Rogers Clay, Commissioner.

Reversing.

In this suit against the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company to recover damages to his property, alleged to have been caused by the diversion of the waters of Paint Lick Creek, plaintiff, George W. Conn, recovered a verdict and judgment for $2,000. The railroad company appeals.

Plaintiff’s property lies in the town of Paint Lick. At this point Paint Lick Creek runs between the counties of Garrard and Madison. Defendant’s railroad runs from Richmond to Lancaster in a southwestern direction. The creek runs in a northwestern…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pike County v. SowardsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Heckaman v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Conn.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. SaulsberryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  4. Seay v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  5. Eikland v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API