Legal Opinion

United States v. Lawrence Scialabba and Robert T. Cechini

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 28, 2002No. 01-1291, 01-1292PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

A financial transaction involving the “proceeds” of crime, and designed to promote the carrying on of certain offenses, is unlawful money laundering. 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1). Neither the Supreme Court nor this circuit has defined the word “proceeds”, and there is no definition in the statute itself. This ease presents the question whether “proceeds” refers to the gross income from an offense, or only the net income. We conclude that, at least when the crime entails voluntary, businesslike operations, “proceeds” must be net income; otherwise the predicate crime merges…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Simpson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Busic v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. Mandell Jackson, Joseph Davis, and Romano GinesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. United States v. SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. United States v. ThornCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  3. People v. GutmanIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Morales v. BezyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. ResnickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API