Legal Opinion

Sharon Tube Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 23, 2006No. 2354 C.D. 2005PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Sharon Tube Company (Employer) petitions for review of the October 28, 2005, order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB), which reversed the decision of a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) and granted the reinstatement petition filed by Daniel T. Buzard (Claimant). We affirm.

Claimant suffered a work-related injury on November 13, 1995, and he received benefits pursuant to a WCJ’s award. On Monday, July 21, 2003, Claimant returned to work with a loss of wages, and Employer modified Claimant’s benefits to reflect his earned wages.1 Claimant’s treating *930physicia…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beissel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Anderson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Mancini v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Weismantle v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Lifequest Nursing Ctr. v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. D. Wolfe v. Martellas Pharmacy (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Frank Martz Coach Company v. WCAB (Avila)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. LifeQuest Nursing Center v. WCAB (Tisdale)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API