Pitch'n Putt, Inc. v. Atcheson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
The defendants contend that since the plaintiff did not prove that the proximate cause of her injuries was due to the defendants’ negligence, the summary judgment should have been granted. With this contention we cannot agree. While it is true that upon the trial of the case the plaintiff may not be able to carry the burden of proof required of her, as was stated in Chastain v. Atlanta Gas Light Co., 122 Ga. App. 90 (3) (176 SE2d 487): "A party who moves for summary judgment in a case premised on negligence has a considerable burden, and if the moving party is defendant,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holland v. Sanfax CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Malcom v. MalcolmCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. BeaverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Chastain v. Atlanta Gas Light Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Hanchey v. HartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gray v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Cox v. K-Mart Enterprises of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. AtchesonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971