Broezel v. City of Buffalo
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, Erie county. Action by John Broezel, Jr., and others against the city of Buffalo, to vacate and set aside as a cloud upon plaintiff's title certain special assessments levied on their land for the purpose of extending Ellicott street. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMacomber, J.
The common council of the city of Buffalo, on the 28th day of May, 1883, passed an ordinance for the acquisition of lands necessary to extend Ellicott street from the southerly line of Seneca street to the northerly line of Exchange street, particularly describing the same. This resolution having been approved by the mayor, the city did, on the 2d day of J une, cause to be published in the oflieial newspaper of the city such notice of intention as was declared by its resolution, which notice was published on the 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th, 15th, and 16th days of that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Davis v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Wood v. . MorehouseNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Western R.R. Co. v. . NolanNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Moore v. . City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smith v. City of BuffaloNew York Supreme Court · 1895