Legal Opinion

In Re Seibold

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho

Decided June 22, 2006No. 19-00134PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

JIM D. PAPPAS, Bankruptcy Judge.

Background

In this dispute, chapter 7 Debtor Helen Seibold (“Debtor”) asks the Court to order trustee R. Sam Hopkins to turn over a portion of the sale proceeds realized from the sale of her vehicle because, she argues, they are exempt. Docket No. 30. Trustee asserts that he avoided a security interest Debtor had granted to a creditor on the vehicle, and that under § 551, 1 the avoided security interest is preserved thereby allowing him to retain all of the otherwise exempt proceeds for distribution to unsecured creditors. After a hearing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Heintz v. Carey (In Re Heintz)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Simplot v. WILLIAM C. OWENS, MD, PAIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Philip Morris Capital Corp. v. Bering Trader, Inc. (In re Bering Trader, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Idaho Bank & Trust Co. v. Cargill, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Best v. Galloway (In Re Best)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. In re: Steven John Wharton and Josephina Jessie WhartonUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. In re BillUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2015
  4. Gugino v. Rowley (In re Floyd)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2015
  5. In re DolvenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API