Legal Opinion

United States v. Allen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 14, 1893No. 101PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. At Law. Action by Charles R. Allen against the United States to recover a drawback on imported coal. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error. 52 Fed. 575.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWLEY, District Judge.

On the 6th of April, 1891, Charles R. Allen, appellee herein, brought this action to recover from the United States, appellant herein, the sum of $93.94 alleged to be due him as drawback under the provisions of the act of congress of March 3, 1883, (22 Stat. 511,) as amended by the act of June 19, 1886, (24 Stat. 81,) on certain bituminous coal by him imported into the United States, and subsequently consumed as fuel on the Humboldt, a steam vessel of the United States engaged in the coasting trade of this country.

There is no controversy as to the facts. The merits of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Corbin v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. In re StrausU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Omar Washington v. Daniel Martuscello Jr., et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API